I think that our scores on the Promis scales are great, but I think that some Promis scales are just not the most valuable. For one, the scale is so subjective that you can’t really agree on what you think, and second, it’s based on “yes” or “no” answers, and that’s just not good enough.
Promis is a self-reported scale that is designed to give you a general idea about whether a person wants to become a Promisor or not. The reason why it works that way, is because, as you might imagine, it’s very subjective. It’s important to remember, however, that the questions that give you the most points are not the most important.
The problem with the promis scale is that it is subjective and based on what the person gives you, not what they actually want. Its true that the more you know a person, the more you can get from them. But there is a great difference between knowing someone and liking them and actually wanting to be with them. And one could argue that the most important thing to know about a person is how they really feel and act, not what they say about themselves.
I think this is a misunderstanding of what promis is. It is not how much you say you want to do. It is how you feel about what you do. And there is a difference between feeling and acting. A person can be so excited about a big project that they are so filled with energy, that they are actually acting in a way that makes that project more important than anything else in their life. But that doesn’t have to be the case.
When you’re ready to take action, you’re simply saying out loud that you want to do what you’re doing now, but you’re not really acting. This is particularly true for people in relationships. It can feel a little strange to say out loud that you want to go on a date with a special someone, because you’re not really acting. But the same goes for people who don’t have the capacity to act.
The problem with this is that we can act without having the capacity to be anything. We can get very passionate about making the world a better place, but without the motivation to do so, we are just a bunch of zombies. We can act, and then we are nothing. We can try to do something, but because we cant do anything, were just dead.
You can act without the capacity to be anything. This is not to say that you can’t act. If you have the ability to be someone who can do something, or can see a situation and make a choice, then you can be someone who can do something. People who have this ability are called “actors”. There are people who act as if they are a character in a movie, but really are just a human.
People who can act are called actors. I think the term actor is a bit overrated and not as descriptive as it used to be. People use it to mean they can do something that doesn’t require them to be in a specific environment. The term actor, as used in this video, and the rest of the site, is actually a bit more specific. You can act while you are in a specific environment and be in a specific state.
I do believe that acting in a way that does not require the environment is not acting at all. The point being made here is that actors are just people who can act. It doesnt have to be in a specific way. That’s why we use the term “dancer” to refer to some people who can act while in a specific environment. We could have a site dedicated to people who can dance while in a specific environment.
A dancer can move while on the same platform with someone else. For example, you and I could both move while dancing. I know because I can move my body to the music (and sometimes there is no music). Thats exactly what we do in a video game.